The day following President Obama signing Public Law 111-230, the fee increase on H-1B and L-1 visas became effective (August 14, 2010) through September 30, 2014.

What exactly is this law and what does it stipulate? It requires the submission of an additional fee of $2,000 for certain H-1B petitions and $2,250 for certain L-1A and L-1B petitions postmarked on or after August 14, 2010.  We were surprised that this announcement  which our office just saw posted today, is retroactive and being implemented before USCIS revises the I-129 Petition.  The fees apply to initial H-1B or L-1 employment – change of status and change of employer cases, in the same instances that require the Fraud Prevention Fee.  It is not required if an employer is filing to extend an H-1B or L-1 employee’s status.

What employers are subject to the new fee increase? The fee increase apply to employers who employ 50 or more employees in the USA with more than 50% of its employees in the USAS in H-1B or L (including L-1A, L-1B and L-2) nonimmigrant status. Petitioners meeting these criteria must submit the fee with an H-1B or L-1 petition filed.  It is noted that L-2 dependents of L-1 employees, are eligible for employment authorization documetns (EADs).  The USCIS recognized the difficulty for employers in adding such individuals into the count, but concluded that it is required under the law.  We are interpreting that this means that an employer who hires an L-2 dependent that has work authorization will be required to pay an additional fee of $2,250 to continue to employ them where an EAD is required for authorized employment.

USCIS will issue RFE’s: According to the August 19, 2010 public teleconference that USCIS held, cases filed without the new fee will not be rejected.  USCIS will issue Requests for Evidence (RFEs) on the cases that the new fee appears to be required.  Where USCIS does not any notation or attached evidence with the initial filing, it may issue an RFE to determine whether the petition is covered by the  Public Law. An RFE may be required even if such evidence is submitted, they advise, if questions arise.

Recommendations: USCIS encourages employers to include the additional fee as a separate check rather than adding this amount to the other filing fee checks, making it easy to simply return a check rather than reject an entire case filing for an incorrect filing fee.  Until such time as the form is revised, it has been recommended that the petitioner include a notation of whether the fee is required in bold capital letters at the top of the cover letter and, if it is required, pertinent documentation.

Issues: There are questions pertaining to L-1 petitions under the L-1 blanket program and how to work this out abroad at the US Consulates.  We will continue to keep you informed on this issue.

An interesting sidebar that came to light yesterday on the fee increase had to do with the fact that since it is common knowledge that the law targets Indian staffing agencies and consulting companies as well as medium to large IT employers, that it is probably a violation of the General Agreement on Trade and Services, an agreement that is vital to ensuring US companies are able to employ many of the 6,000,000 Americans working around the world.

Further, reported by Computerworld, the Department of State revealed this week that the U.S. is reviewing whether a law that increases some visa fees is compliant with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and are also talking to Indian officials about the law and its implications.  India’s Commerce Secretary Rahul Khullar told reporters in Delhi on Tuesday that the visa fee hike is incompatible with the WTO.

We encourage you to sign up to receive our free information and join our worldwide readership.

::::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions provides US and global visa services to individuals and employers throughout the USA and abroad.  We specialize in business immigration and have a depth of experience in the IT, healthcare, arts, entertainment, and sports industries, amongst others.  Our services include complex business visas for investors, multinational managers, skilled professionals and outstanding individuals in science, business, education, athletics and entertainment.  We additionally provide employer compliance consulting services on proper I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) auditing, training, and work with our clients to develop compliant immigration policies and procedures.  We offer these services, as well, to government contractors and advise on FAR E-Verify enrollment and compliance issues.

President Barack Obama on Friday signed a bill directing $600 million more to securing the U.S.-Mexico border, a modest election-year victory that underscores his failure so far to deliver an overhaul of immigration law from Congress.

Obama signed the bill Friday in a low-key Oval Office ceremony alongside Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. There were cameras present, but no reporters. The action came a day after the Senate convened in special session during its summer recess to pass the bill.

“Look, only Congress can pass a bill,” Napolitano said. “The president can advocate. He can get them to the table, as he has in the Roosevelt Room upstairs. He can implore. He can provide ideas. He can agree to a framework, as he already has. He can give a major address that spells out what’s needed in a bill, but only Congress can pass a bill.”

The new law will pay for the hiring of 1,000 more Border Patrol agents to be deployed at critical areas, as well as more Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. It provides for new communications equipment and greater use of unmanned surveillance drones. The Justice Department gets more money to help catch drug dealers and human traffickers.

“Efforts to overhaul our broken immigration system have once again taken a back seat to appeasing anti-immigrant xenophobes, as Congress passed another dramatic escalation in border enforcement with very little evidence that past escalations have been effective,” said Margaret Moran, president of the League of United Latin American Citizens.

More on this

Obama’s Statement on Passing the Border Security Bill

USA Today

► Breaking News

• Judge Blocks AZ Law

A federal judge today blocked the most controversial parts of Arizona’s immigration law from taking effect, delivering a last-minute victory to opponents of the crackdown.  The judge also put on hold parts of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places.  We link here and here for more on the subject

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

NEWS BYTES FOR OUR ARTS, SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT CLIENTS:

• Immigration Solutions’ July Sports | Arts & Entertainment News

• Sports Teams and Celebrities Among those Facing Visa Refusals

• Iroquois Lacrosse Team Denied UK Visas

• James Cameron’s offer to help with BP Oil Spill turned down

• NYU  Music Technology Program
  

• US Reversal on Visa Denied to Colombian Journalist

and more

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

• Thinking of Applying for US Citizenship?

New Brochure:  http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resources/Citizenship%20&%20Naturalization%20Based%20Resources/G-1151.pdf

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Immigration Solutions provides US and global visa services to individuals and employers throughout the USA and abroad.  We specialize in business immigration and have a depth of experience in the IT, healthcare, arts & entertainment sectors, amongst others.  Our services include complex business visas for investors, multinational managers, skilled professionals and outstanding individuals in science, business, education, athletics and entertainment.  We additionally provide employer compliance consulting services on proper I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification) auditing, training, and work with our clients to develop compliant immigration policies and procedures.

DHS finalized a regulation that provides greater flexibility for employers to electronically sign and store I-9 forms, which are used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to verify employment eligibility-eliminating the need for paper filing and streamlining efforts to ensure a legal workforce nationwide.

Employers—who complete and retain the Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification)—may sign the form electronically and retain the form in an electronic format.

More in the final rule:

1)  DHS will allow competing paper and electronic systems:  This clarifies that an employer moving to an electronic system need not create digital images/data related to historical paper forms. However, from some employer’s perspective monitoring two distinct verification systems for compliance may be too difficult a logistical challenge. These particular employers have elected to go entirely electronic to take advantage of the ability to monitor compliance and provide for electronic reminders. We strongly recommend that employers should continue to approach converting paper I-9s to electronic images very carefully, first discussing the benefits as well as the concerns (in particular audit related and privilege issues) with their immigration attorneys.

2)  The final rule reaffirms that employers will not be required to use a specific technology to complete and store I-9 information, so long as the system they use ensures accessibility and they are able to produce a reasonable facsimile or copy of the I-9.

3)  The final rule will also relax the audit trail requirement from the interim rule so that employers no longer have to keep records of when the information is accessed or viewed. Instead, an audit trail will only need to include information on the the initial completion and any subsequent modification to the I-9.

4)  The final rule will also relax the interim rule’s requirement to provide a transaction record to the employee at the time the electronic I-9 is created. Under the rule to be published tomorrow, the employer may “provide or transmit a confirmation of the transaction only if an employee requests it . . . within a reasonable period of time.” Finally, the final rule will remove the mandate that the electronic storage system be searchable “by any data element,” requiring only an indexing system that “permits the identification and retrieval for viewing or reproducing of relevant documents and records maintained in an electronic storage system.”

5) Indexing does not require all fields:   The final rule identifies that not all of the “data element(s)” must be searchable, but that the system must provide a sense of “searchability” consistent with the amended 8 CFR Sec. 274a.2(e)(6).

More information about I-9 forms and Employment Eligibility Verification is available on the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website at www.uscis.gov/I-9.

For further guidance on the electronic signing and storage of the I-9, and the changes to the current regulations to assist businesses in complying with the requirements of the law, please visit www.ice.gov or view the Federal Register at www.gpoaccess.gov.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

What can Immigration Solution do for you?

Our firm’s years of experience and knowledge with employer compliance and worksite enforcement issues can assist your business in offsetting the extent of sanctions and other ICE enforcement threats.  Because of this, employer compliance is becoming more complex and enforcement (investigations and audits) is increasing.

In order to effectively deal with these issues and avoid the very severe consequences for non-compliance, employers must take the time to develop a strategy and be prepared in advance with an Immigration Compliance Program. Immigration Solutions has created a package of services and solutions to assist you with your compliance procedures that can be tailored to your specific needs and concerns.  Contact our office should you wish to discuss your audit, training and compliance needs.

The Obama administration has been holding behind-the-scenes talks to determine whether the Department of Homeland Security can unilaterally grant legal status on a mass basis to illegal immigrants, a former Bush administration official who spoke with at least three people involved in those talks told FoxNews.com on 6/21/10.

The issue was raised publicly by eight Republican senators who wrote to the White House last week to complain that they had heard the administration was readying a “Plan B” in case a comprehensive immigration reform bill cannot win enough support to clear Congress.

The White House has neither confirmed or denied this claim.  It’s unclear what section of the illegal immigrant population such a move would target. But the former Bush official said the discussions are real.

“The administration at the very minimum is studying legal ways to legalize people without having to go through any congressional debate about it,” the source said, calling the senators’ claim credible. “Whether somebody pulls the trigger on that, that’s another issue.”

The senators — Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Orrin Hatch, R-Utah; David Vitter, R-La.; Jim Bunning, R-Ky.; Saxby Chambliss, Ga.; Johnny Isakson, R-Ga.; and James Inhofe, R-Okla  – claimed in their letter that the administration was looking at extending what is known as deferred action or parole to millions of illegal aliens in the United States.

For more on this story

ICE has filed a 60-day notice for a new information collection application with the OMB (Office of Management and Budget) for their IMAGE Program (ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers) that is the education component of the Office of Investigations (OI) Worksite Enforcement program.  The Notice is available here.  Comments will be accepted for 60 days until August 10, 2010, and should be sent to the person named in the Notice.

In an article published on ILW.com on the subject, the author states:

In July of 2006, ICE announced two measures billed as “voluntary partnerships with the government.” The first is a list of what the agency considers to be “Best Hiring Practices.” The second is a voluntary program entitled the “ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers,” also referred to as IMAGE , which it has been working on since at least July of 2005. The government is actively promoting these programs to employers.

What are considered Best Hiring practices?

As part of the ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers, the (IMAGE) program, DHS recommends the following “best hiring practices” as follows:

• Use E-Verify to verify the employment eligibility of all new hires.
• Use the Social Security Number Verification Service (SSNVS) and make a good-faith effort to correct and verify the names and Social Security numbers of the current workforce.
• Establish a written hiring and employment eligibility verification policy (I-9 policy)
• Establish an internal compliance and training program related to the hiring and employment verification process, including completion of the I-9 form, how to detect the fraudulent use of documents in the verification process, and how to use E-Verify and SSNVS.  Require the I-9 and E-Verify process to be conducted only by an individual who has received appropriate training, and include a secondary review as part of each employee’s verification “to minimize the potential for a single individual to subvert the process.”
• Arrange for annual I-9 audits by an external auditing firm or a trained employee not otherwise involved in the I-9 process.
• Establish a procedure to report to ICE credible information of suspected criminal misconduct in the employment eligibility verification process.
• Establish a program to assess subcontractors’ compliance with employment eligibility verification requirements. Encourage contractors to incorporate IMAGE Best Practices and when practicable incorporate the verification requirements in subcontractor agreements.
• Establish a protocol for responding to letters received from federal and state government agencies indicating that there is a discrepancy between the agency’s information and the information provided by the employer or employee (for example, “no-match” letters received from the Social Security Administration).
• Establish a tip line mechanism (e.g., inbox, e-mail) for employees to report activity relating to the employment of unauthorized workers, and a protocol for responding to employee tips.
• Establish and maintain appropriate policies, practices, and safeguards against use of the verification process for unlawful discrimination, and to ensure that U.S. citizens and authorized workers do not face discrimination with respect to hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee because of citizenship status or national origin.
• Maintain copies of any documents accepted as proof of identity and/or employment authorization for all new hires.

Note:  It is important to notice that some of these points listed above have critical content.  We link to the ILW.com excellent analysis of Best Practices and the IMAGE program for employers to carefully consider prior to enrolling in these programs.

Should you require further assistance or consultation regarding these programs, please contact our office.

As reported by the Legal Action Center (AILA).  Broadgate et al. v. USCIS et al., No. 1:10cv00941 (D.C.D. filed June 8, 2010)

Three employers (software developers and IT services firms) and two not-for-profit trade associations are challenging the Neufeld memo in federal district court. The plaintiffs allege that USCIS issued the memo in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice and comment requirements; that USCIS failed to perform a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis; that the memo is inconsistent with existing regulations addressing the employee-employer relationship and the term “contractor” and conflicts with the plain language of the INA; and that it is arbitrary and capricious. Plaintiffs ask the court to preliminarily and permanently enjoin USCIS from implementing the memo.

AILA sent a detailed letter to USCIS Chief Council, Roxana Bacon, in which it expressed concern about the substance of the January 8, 2010 H-1B memo and noted that its issuance was in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act’s notice and comment requirements. The letter primarily focuses on recent USCIS decisions that unlawfully find that individuals with controlling or substantial interests in a petitioning U.S. company or its foreign parent company cannot — in most cases — be a beneficiary of a nonimmigrant or immigrant employment-based petition.

We will continue to keep you posted on this topic.

::::::::

USCIS Proposes Fee Increase

USCIS has published a Proposed Rule in the Federal Register to increase immigration fees.  The cost of applying for a green card will increase from $930 to $985.  The application fee for a family petition (I-130) will be $420, up from $355.  The cost of an I-140 employment-based petition will rise over $100 and premium processing fees will increase by 22.5%.  The application for employment authorization would increase to $380 from $340. A separate fee for fingerprints and other biometrics with many applications would increase to $85 from $80.  Among several new fees, officials said, will be a $6,230 charge for foreigners proposing to invest $500,000 or more in businesses to create jobs in the United States.

The NY Times reports that Alejandro Mayorkas, director of  USCIS, said the fee increase was necessary because declining applications for documents in the past two years had lowered revenues and left his agency — which is 90% financed by fees — with a budget shortfall of about $200 million for the coming fiscal year.

The increases come as Congress has put off immigration legislation and an Arizona law that makes it a state crime to be in the country illegally goes into effect July 29.

The timing makes Clarissa Martinez wonder what message the fee increases sends to immigrants trying to take a legal path into the country.  “It begs the question of Congress: If we want these people to take these steps, we have to make sure that we’re not pricing them out of their reach,” said Martinez, director of immigration and national campaigns for the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic civil rights group.

::::::::

If you’d like to stay in touch with our office and sign up for our information, blog and news, you can do so here. You can follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn here.

The government contracting official decides if your contract qualifies for the E-Verify clause and if you meet the following criteria:

• The contract was awarded on or after the Federal contractor rule effective date of September 8, 2009 and includes the FAR E-Verify clause
• The contract has a period of performance that is more than 120 days
• The contract’s value exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold of $100,000
• At least some portion of the work under the contract is performed in the United States

What if you use Subcontractors?

All subcontractors must also verify all existing employees directly performing work under the covered contract. Contractors will need to include a clause for a subcontractor if they meet the following criteria:

• Is for commercial or non-commercial services or construction
• Exceeds $3,000; and
• Includes work performed in the United States

We have a talented team of attorneys and specialists to assist you with pre-Everify audits, reporting and training to get you ready for enrollment. Call us to arrange a consultation today.  562 612.3996.  Our Compliance Services and Solutions: http://www.immigrationsolution.netemployer_compliance_services_solutions.php

California-based client receives FAR E-Verify contract language and waits until the 11th hour to get their I-9’s in order:

In order to properly enroll in the DHS FAR E-Verify free Internet-Based program, or a vendor-based Designated Agent program, the contractor must rely upon the accuracy of their I-9’s and the information provided by their employees on the I-9 form.  We recommend a proactive approach to this issue by obtaining a pre-EVerify I-9 audit (can be a random audit or a complete audit depending upon the condition of your I-9s) to pinpoint reoccurring issues and correc them – with accompanying I-9 compliance training and the establishment of policy and procedure around how your company will handle this function – then you’re ready to enroll in E-Verify.

If you have questions or require any of the above services, our distinguished team of attorneys and specialists are available to work with you on your compliance needs.

Leslie Davis, Managing Director
Immigration Solutions

As reported by ImmigrationImpact.com

This month marks the 7th anniversary of the DHS which is home to the nation’s three immigration agencies (ICE, CBP and USCIS).  It also marks the end of a sweeping internal review ordered by DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano which has not been made public.

The Immigration Policy Center has released a report entitled DHS Progress Report: The Challenge of Reform to assess the 1st year of the Obama Administration’s immigration policy.

On the plus side, there has been more public engagement and discussion of DHS priorities. ICE has announced, although not fully implemented, numerous detention reforms. It has done away with the massive worksite raids of the past few years, placing greater emphasis on employer violations. The Obama Administration and USCIS have made some genuine inroads into immigration fee reform, backlog reduction, and expanded naturalization and integration efforts. Secretary Napolitano has also invested significant time and resources into developing plans for comprehensive immigration reform.

These are just some of the examples of changes within the last year. Ultimately, this first year was mostly frustrating—a year where the promise of reform seems to fight daily with the dynamics of an entrenched belief in an enforcement driven culture. For every two steps forward, it seems that the Department takes one steps backward.

It has been reported that today President Obama is scheduled to meet with two key congressional players in the movement for immigration reform—Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Sen. Lindsay Graham (R-SC)—who are working together behind the scenes to draft a bipartisan immigration bill. The President is expected to ask the Senators to produce a reform bill blueprint that “could be turned into legislative language.” Some think that the meeting is another positive signal from the White House, and others view it as a “last-ditch effort in an election year.” Although interpretations are mixed, a spokesman for the White House affirmed that the President is still committed to reforming our immigration system.  More on this