As reported in the Washington Post 5/24/2010

Democrats crafting an overhaul of U.S. immigration laws are bringing a new approach to a long-stalled debate: giving a federal commission some power over the future flow of legal foreign workers.

Senate Democratic leaders are drafting a measure to authorize a commission to recommend levels of employment-based visas and green cards that let immigrants work legally in the United States. The plan would require Congress, in certain cases, to vote when immigrant labor is deemed out of line with demand. Although the commission would have limited influence over the skilled-immigrant market for technology and other industries, it would have a major role in regulating low-skilled foreign labor.

The commission idea originally came from Ray Marshall, Labor Secretary under President Jimmy Carter. The United States needs a nonpartisan panel that would use “rigorous” data analysis in its decisions, Marshall said in an interview.

The idea is another example of lawmakers showing a willingness to relinquish decision-making to commissions on issues that include reducing the federal debt, Iraq war policy and curbing Medicare costs.

“It’s the ultimate expression for the need for political cover,” said Ross Baker, a political science professor at Rutgers University.

Legislation being drafted by Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) is expected to take a different tack, said a Schumer aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The panel they envision would have a stronger role in deciding immigrant-worker levels in lower-skilled occupations — such as hotel and restaurant jobs — than in higher-skilled ones.

We’ll see how all this plays out and will continue to report on any and all immigration reform measures.

If you’re an employer that despite your efforts to hire US workers, must rely on foreign workers to grow your business, sign this petition and send it to your representatives and then pass the link along.

When should I start my case?

Immigration Solutions accepts H-1B cap-subject cases well in advance to avoid the rush that normally occurs when employers become aware of cap deadlines and when foreign workers obtain job offers that require cap subject visa numbers.  Bottom line, cap-subject cases should be started ASAP.

How long does it take to prepare an H-1B Case?

We do not recommend waiting until the last minute because of the various government agencies that are involved in the process.  With good front-end case strategy, our attorneys’ depth of experience and a streamlined case process, the many steps involved in preparing an H-1B, requiring the cooperation of all parties, can go very smooth and an approvable petition can be filed with all necessary documents.  An approval requires that a case be prepared correctly from the start.  It is often not possible to reverse strategy after the case is filed. Planning ahead is crucial to flush out any issues that need to be overcome.

In summary, the demand for H-1B visas, although not as high in this economy, have tougher documentation standards and Department of Labor delays with new LCA software.  By understanding the issues involved in the H-1B process, Immigration Solutions takes a proactive approach to assure that the needs of their clients are addressed early.

If you are not a client of our firm and would like to discuss H-1Bs as well as any other immigration matters, we invite you to contact us.  My email address is leslie@immigrationsolution.net, telephone is 562 612.3996.  If you’d prefer to request a consultation, you can do so here

Senators Bernard Sanders (I-VT) and Charles Grassley (R-IA) announced that they will introduce a bill to restrict the ability of employers to hire non-immigrant workers if the employer conducts “mass layoffs” under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act. The new bill, titled the Employ America Act (EAA), will be introduced in the U.S. Senate soon.

EAA would require employers filing temporary worker petitions to attest that they have not had a “mass layoff” in the 12 months immediately preceding the foreign worker’s proposed hire date and that they do not intend to have a mass layoff in the future. In addition, if an employer does conduct a mass layoff, all existing visas approved in the 12 months before the employer issued a “WARN Notice” would expire 60 days after the notice. Affected foreign nationals would be required to leave the United States within the 60-day period.  We link to the Senate Press Release

The Warn Act defines a massive lay off as:  A reduction in force that will result in employment loss at a single employment site during any 30-day period of (1) at least 500 employees, not including part-time employees; or (2) 50 to 499 employees, excluding part-time employees, if the laid-off employees constitute at least 33% of the employees at the site, also not including part-time employees. For purposes of WARN, an employment loss is (1) an employment termination, other than a discharge for cause, a voluntary departure or retirement; (2) a layoff that exceeds six months; or (3) a reduction in an employee’s work hours of more than 50% in each month of any six-month period. However, certain transfers to other employment sites are not considered to be employment losses.  An employer is not required to issue a WARN Notice if a mass layoff is the result of the completion of a particular project or undertaking, if the workers were hired with the understanding that their employment would be of a temporary duration.

The good news is – with comprehensive immigration reform (CIR) on hold until next year, it is doubtful that this will pass although it still could be introduced in another piece or legislation.

We’ve had several blog posts on the reverse brain drain issue.  This is a very interesting post that we found on TechCrunch today by Vivek Wadhwa, an entrepreneur turned academic who is a Visiting Scholar at UC-Berkeley, Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School and Executive in Residence at Duke University.  The writer expresses concerns as to what is occurring in the IT sector today and why the brightest and the best are deciding not to put down roots in the USA.

Vivek spent Columbus Day in Silicon Valley meeting a roomful of new Indian arrivals to the USA. The event was organized by Think India Foundation, a think tank that seeks to solve problems that Indians face.

When introducing the topic of skilled immigration, the discussion moderator, Sand Hill Group founder M.R. Rangaswami asked the obvious question. How many planned to return to India?  He was shocked to see more than three-quarters of the audience raise their hands.  One has to ask why would such talented people voluntarily leave Silicon Valley, a place that remains the hottest hotbed of technology innovation on Earth? Or to leave other promising locales such as New York City, Boston and the Research Triangle area of North Carolina?

What they learned was that the average age of the Indian returnees was 30 and the Chinese was 33. They were really well educated: 51% of the Chinese held masters degrees and 41% had PhDs. Among Indians, 66% held a masters and 12% had PhDs. These degrees were mostly in management, technology, and science. Clearly these returnees are in the U.S. population’s educational top tier—precisely the kind of people who can make the greatest contribution to an economy’s innovation and growth. And it isn’t just new immigrants who are returning home, we learned. Some 27% of the Indians and 34% of the Chinese had permanent resident status or were U.S. citizens. That’s right—it’s not just about green cards.

We link to a letter co-authored by the Semiconductor Industry of America (SIA) and the Industry of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) to the Congressional Subcommittee on Immigration.  The letter calls for sensible immigration reform – reforming quotas to match industry needs – reducing the ever-growing visa wait times for green-cards for skilled worker.

For the first time in several years the H1B visa program, once the most sought after among Indian professionals, is unlikely to reach its cap of 65,000 before the start of the 2010 fiscal with nearly 20,000 slots lying vacant thanks to the tattered US economy.

The US Citizenship and Immigration Services reports as of August 7, 2009 that it has received approximately 49,400 H-1B petitions counting toward the Congressionally-mandated 65,000 cap, more than four months after it started accepting applications for visas for the 2010 fiscal year beginning  October 1st

This is in contrast to previous years when the USCIS had to resort to a computerized lottery.

We link to the article in Business Standard.  Contact us for your H-1B cases and questions.

We’ve been covering this topic at Immigration Solutions for quite awhile.  Canada has figured out how to implement a much more user friendly immigration system to navigate than the USA.  Have a listen to our audio conference Living and Working in Canada

The Immigration Impact article states:  “If we needed any proof that our dysfunctional immigration system inhibits our economic growth, our neighbors to the north have provided us that proof. Canada is actively exploiting, to their economic benefit, our backlogged and broken immigration system. Canada is recruiting the best and brightest American-trained foreign nationals through a streamlined immigration process. After receiving a U.S. education, these talented foreign nationals are now contributing to Canada’s economic future instead of ours.”

Congress! – it’s time to wake up so that we stop “saying goodbye” to the brightest and best!

At a recent conference, Bill Gates shared his ideas about US immigration policy, noting that there should be more “exceptions for smart people.” While not the most eloquently phrased statement, it does pose an interesting question in the immigration reform debate.  Are we turning away skilled workers?  Or are they leaving on their own, thanks to a complicated and unfriendly system of paperwork and jumping through hoops that are never ending?  We link to the article

A Wall Street Journal opinion piece points out that an infusion of innovators is even more needed in a recession. “Companies founded by immigrants include Yahoo. eBay and Google. Half of Silicon Valley start-ups were founded by immigrants, up from 25% a decade ago. Some 40% of patents in the US are awarded to immigrants. A recent study by the Kauffman Foundation found that immigrants are 50% likelier to start businesses than natives. Immigrant-founded technology firms employ 450,000 workers in the US.